Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Play vs. Film

I thought that they did a really good job picking actors for these roles. You can completely believe that Blanche is crazy; her facial expressions when she talks, and the reactions to the voices she hears in her head sell the crazy bit. I felt a little more sympathy for Blanche reading the play rather than watching the film, this may be because actually seeing it had more of an impact than reading it. While reading it I must admit that I did not notice a lot of blanches double loaded lines. Each time she goes to lie in the film she puts her hands up to her throat and chest, as if to help block the fact that she is seeping lies. I also thought it was interesting the way the actress that played Blanche varied her voice, when she would lie and on most occasions it was soft, airy and fast paced. However, when she was actually telling the truth, her voice would go deep and become slower. This was an interesting contrast to me, it made Blanch seem like she was crazy and brought her character to life.

Stanley’s character was also made believable; the actor did a great job portraying this overly masculinized and sexualized person. The movie made me feel more sympathy for Stanley than the play did, because you actually felt bad that this crazy sister in law was really messing up his life. While I still greatly disagreed with all of his actions, it was easier to see where he was coming from when you actually were able to watch it.

I thought that Stella’s character was portrayed differently in the movie then in the film, she seemed to be more physical with Stanley, at one point she ripped his shirt and pushed him around a bit, i didnt see that at all in the play. she also, seemed a lot more independent, and willing to stand up for what is right. While she did not do these things completely, the play led you to believe she never did these things and never would. The new ending also made Stella a stronger character, even though she sent her sister away to a mental hospital, she resists Stanley completely after that, where she actually tells him never to touch her again, and says that she is never going back there as she ran up the stairs with her baby. I think that his new scene helps to add to the theme of the play and to the character Stella. It made it so that I was that mad at her for sending her sister away, because in the end she at least made the right choice and left Stanley.

Some of the scenes that they added made it all seem more realistic. Such as the police officer that comes when Blanche freaks out, and the fact that she just screamed like crazy rather than yelling fire.

I thought it was interesting how open they made Stella’s and Stanley’s house, at one point you see Blanche rushing around closing all these shutters and curtains and it makes it seem like their home is a lot bigger than it actually is, while still maintaining that fact that it’s a really poor house. I also thought that the scenery chosen for Blanche and Mitch’s date did well to show the gloominess of Blanche’s character. The fog over the lake, and the dock setting worked well with Blanche’s dark story that she tells Mitch.

I just feel in general watching this play is much easier to pick up on everything than reading the play. It brought it to life more and helped the themes in the story to be easier to pick out. In addition, the ending made me a lot happier; I was not as disappointed as I was with the play. This may be due to the fact that I am a product of the time where endings need to be happy or at least somewhat politically correct to ease my feelings about movies.

4 comments:

Greg said...

I didn't notice that in the play. That's cool that you noticed that when Blanche does that she's lying. I felt bad for her too b/c she's a troubled human being. She seems very unsure of herself.

ShanM125 said...

I have to agree that I felt more sorrow for Blanche in the play than in the movie. In the play, I noticed that she did talk alot, but in the movie I noticed that she was rambling and talking nonsense. At first, I thought "wow, she is crazy." After a while I was wondering how Stella and Stanley had put up with her for so long.

In the play, I thought Stanley was very coniving and deceitful to Blanche. Although in the movie, I thought he was a little cruel to Blanche, I understood where he was coming from. If Blanche had been a little more honest and straightforward, maybe she wouldn't have recieved the wrath bestowed upon her by Stanley. I think Stanley was ultimately the driving force in Blanche being pushed off to a mental facility.

elphingirl said...

I agree with you when she reacts tothe different things that go on in her head. She is a really, really trouble person and you can see that the actress took her time developing the part. I find it interesting that the movie was almost better then the play because you get to see the real images and actions that seemed very vague while reading the play.

DrewC said...

I agree that Stella was portrayed a little differently in the film. Stella seemed to stand up to Stanley a little more than she did in the book. I believe that this was probably due to the difference in the ending of the film. Instead of Stella submissively settling back in to the house with Stanley, she told him that she was going to leave him. Setting up Stella as a slightly stronger character willing to stand on her own two feet and do what she thinks is right portrays the ending of the story much better. I don’t believe that they would have done this if they didn’t change the ending of the movie. It was as if they had to build her character up a little bit or the film ending would not have been believable. In the play script Tennessee Williams made Stella so submissive that she could not even stand up to Stanley when she knew that he had raped her sister. I liked the film version of this a little better, just because it showed an ending that reflected an end, instead of showing an ending where Stella would just continue to deal with the negative effects of Stanley’s actions.